Set in Egyptian Theology

>> Thursday, January 8, 2009

Set (also spelled Seth, Sutekh or Seteh) was one of the early Egyptian deities, a god of the night identified with the northern stars and initially well regarded as the Prince of Darkness. A sign of this regard is the Tcham scepter, having the stylized head and tail of Set. The Tcham scepter, also called the Was scepter, is frequently found in portraits of other other gods as a symbol of magical power, and in later use, as a symbol of control over the force of chaos (Set).

In early paintings Set is shown as a harpoon bearer at the prow of the boat of Ra, warding off the serpent Apep, an evil demon, the deification of darkness and chaos (isfet in Egyptian), and thus opponent of light and Ma'at (order/truth), whose existence was believed from the Middle Kingdom onwards. Yet the warlike and resolute nature of Set seems to have been regarded with ambivalence in Egyptian theology, and his portrayal went through many changes over a period of nearly three thousand years. Pictures of a god bearing two heads, that of Set and his daylight brother Horus the Elder, may be compared to the oriental Yin/Yang symbol as a representation of the union of polarities. In time, the conflict between these two abstract principles came to be emphasized rather than their primal union.

Set's battle with Horus the Elder grew from being a statement of the duality of day and night into an expression of the political conflict among the polytheistic priesthoods for control of the Egyptian theocracy. This was rewritten as a battle between Good and Evil after Egypt expelled the Hyskos in the 18th Dynasty. Some say the Hyskos were Asiatic invaders, and others say they were an indigenous minority that seized control of the nation. This tribe ruled Egypt for a time and happened to favor the Set cult, seeing a resemblance to a storm-god of their own pantheon.

The Set cult never recovered from this identification with the Hyskos. Images of Set were destroyed or defaced. By the time Greek historians visited Egypt, wild asses, pigs, and other beasts identified with the Set cult were driven off cliffs, hacked into pieces or otherwise slaughtered at annual celebrations in a spirit akin to the driving out of the Biblical scapegoat. The report of these historians is often thought to be a valid account of a timeless and immutable theocracy , but just looking at the frequency with which the ruling capital moved to different cities (each being a cult-center) is enough to dispel this idea. One controversial Egyptologist has suggested that the worship of Set might have predated the concept of paternity. Later cults incorporating a father god would reject this fatherless son.

This introduces another bizarre factor in the transformation of the Night/Day battle between brothers into an inheritance dispute between Set and Horus the Younger. Any book on Egyptian myth you pick up contains the gory details of this cosmic lawsuit, which includes things that make DYNASTY look like a prayer breakfast. It is somewhat intriguing, though, that while all books affirm that Set tore Osiris to pieces, everybody knows about Osiris, and it is quite hard to collect the pieces of the puzzle that is Set. Egyptologists have never agreed what the animal used to symbolize Set actually is. Since the sages of ancient Egypt did not use an unrecognizable creature to represent any other major deity, we may guess that this is intentional, and points, like the Tcham scepter, to an esoteric meaning.

References:
Budge, E.A. Wallis. THE GODS OF THE EGYPTIANS.
Grant, Kenneth. CULTS OF THE SHADOW.
Graves, Robert. THE WHITE GODDESS.
Ions, Veronica. EGYPTIAN MYTHOLOGY.
Massey, Gerald. THE NATURAL GENESIS.
Russell, Jeffrey Burton. THE DEVIL.

You can try to find some of them at AbeBooks - New Books section. Failing that your best option is checking the used books section.

Source: Oz Tech

3 comments:

Anonymous January 8, 2009 at 10:02 PM  

Wow! Excellent article, I'm glad I returned to another blog to look for follow up comments and followed your link.

I'm Kemetic so pretty much anything Egyptian and dealing with "cults" interests me.

Mark yourself down a new subscriber. Love the blog.

Archiver January 9, 2009 at 1:24 AM  

Thanks, but a few things to clarify.

I have also touched on this in methodology and some of the excerpts and articles are not written by me. Although I am trying to be very careful with the sources, it still disturbs me. Yet I could not find a better way to organize my archive and more importantly my thoughts.

This particular one was written by Oz Tech (that's all I have) but other references seem to be correct. So, let me at least thank him/her taking this opportunity.

I created two supplementary sites to track my archive. One will be tracking rites and ceremonies and second one motifs and patterns (They should be visible in my profile page. They are not promoted as they are not in a readable stage, yet.

Thanks for your time and kind words.

Anonymous January 10, 2009 at 2:04 PM  

Thanks for the honesty and clarification. I appreciate when someone shares something they have found, to me it doesn't always have to be original content.

I look forward to seeing more of what you have to both, regardless. I'll check out the other sites as well.

Post a Comment

"It is the mark of an educated man to entertain an idea without accepting it." -- Aristotle

  © Blogger template Digi-digi by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP